Sunday, April 28, 2013

Will Yoga Help People Live Healthier Lifestyles?


Liz Kelly

ENGL 102-057

Toulmin Argument Essay

9 April 2013

Will Yoga Help People Live Healthier Lifestyles?

            Stress is an unfortunate part of our everyday lives and its effects are felt by everyone.  Stress affects everyone in different degrees but its presence is undoubtedly felt throughout the nation.  77 percent of people in the United States regularly experience physical symptoms caused by stress and 73 percent of people regularly experience psychological symptoms due to stress (“Stress Statistics”).  When left untreated, stress can lead to a series of declining health conditions, which is why it is important to keep it in check.  Yoga is one way that many Americans are turning toward to help effectively manage the stress in their lives.  Yoga not only improves stress but various other health ailments affecting many in the United States including arthritis, high blood pressure, and back pain.  People should do yoga because it reduces stress and tension and creates a sense of wellbeing both physically and mentally.

            Yoga is a valuable exercise tool that helps most people live healthier lifestyles.  In my experience, people of all shapes, sizes, and ages can do yoga and it is widely available for little cost.  Since yoga is easily accessible to most people, it has increasingly become a health tool for many.  My own experience with yoga has been positive and I have definitely noticed results that have helped me with the stress in my life.  Yoga has not only increased my flexibility and helped my body feel stronger, but above all else it has reduced my stress levels.  After doing yoga many people, myself included, have felt refreshed and ready to tackle the next task of the day. 

            Various studies have shown that yoga is an effective and beneficial means of not only reducing stress and tension but also improving health.  Research shows that yoga helps manage or control anxiety, arthritis, asthma, back pain, blood pressure, carpal tunnel syndrome, chronic fatigue, depression, diabetes, epilepsy, headaches, heart disease, multiple sclerosis, stress and other conditions and diseases (Tunney).  Over 75 scientific trials have been published on yoga in major medical journals (“Yoga for Arthritis”).  These studies have shown that yoga is a safe and effective way to increase physical activity that also has important psychological benefits due to its meditative nature.  As with other forms of exercise, yoga can increase muscle strength, improve flexibility, enhance respiratory endurance, and promote balance (“Yoga for Arthritis).  Yoga is also associated with increased energy and fewer bodily aches and pains (“Yoga for Arthritis”).  Furthermore, yoga is associated with increased mental energy as well as positive feelings (such as alertness and enthusiasm) and fewer negative feelings (such as reduced anxiety and aggressiveness) (“Yoga for Arthritis”). 

            Regular physical activity, particularly yoga, is especially important for people with arthritis, who often have decreased muscle strength, physical energy, and endurance, due to their arthritis and the tendency to be inactive (“Yoga for Arthritis”).  Being inactive can begin a downward spiral where pain increases, leading to more inactivity which leads to greater pain and disability (“Yoga for Arthritis”). The psychological benefits of exercise (in this case yoga), such as stress reduction, fewer depressive symptoms, improved coping and well-being, and enhanced immune functioning also contribute to greater overall health (“Yoga for Arthritis”).  

            In another recent study, researchers focused on 16 studies that recorded the effects of practicing yoga on mental-health issues ranging from depression, schizophrenia, ADHD, sleep complaints, and eating disorders to cognitive problems. They found positive effects of the mind-and-body practice for all conditions with the exception of eating disorders and cognition (Sifferlin).  (These two studies involved too few participants or produced conflicting results to draw any meaningful conclusions) (Sifferlin).  Some of the studies included in the analysis suggested that yoga might affect the body in ways similar to antidepressants and psychotherapy (Sifferlin).  For instance, yoga may influence brain chemicals, known as neurotransmitters, by boosting levels of feel-good agents like serotonin, lowering inflammation, reducing oxidative stress, and producing a healthier balance of lipids and growth factors, just as other forms of exercise do (Sifferlin).  In terms of stress reduction the studies showed that yoga appears to control stress response systems by reducing perceived stress and anxiety (Sifferlin).  This, in turn, decreases physiological stimulation, for example, reducing heart rate, lowering blood pressure, and easing respiration (Sifferlin).  There is also evidence that practicing yoga helps increase heart rate variability, an indicator of the body's ability to respond to stress more flexibly (“Yoga for anxiety and depression”).  Researchers say there is enough evidence to warrant an even larger study on the effects of yoga on mental health, and it should be considered as part of the treatment for more disorders (Sifferlin).

            Other studies showed the benefits of practicing yoga on improving low-back pain.  One NCCAM-funded study of 90 people with chronic low-back pain found that participants who practiced yoga had significantly less disability, pain, and depression after 6 months (“Yoga for Health”).  In a 2011 study, also funded by NCCAM, researchers compared yoga with conventional stretching exercises or a self-care book in 228 adults with chronic low-back pain (“Yoga for Health”).  The results showed that both yoga and stretching were more effective than a self-care book for improving function and reducing symptoms due to chronic low-back pain (“Yoga for Health”).  In a similar 2011 study, patients who took regular yoga classes experienced a greater improvement in back function than those given conventional treatment alone.  The study involved 313 patients with chronic or recurrent back pain undergoing various forms of treatment including painkillers and physiotherapy (“Yoga for Health”).  In addition to their normal treatment, half were assigned to the specially designed three-month yoga program (“Yoga for Health”).  At the end of the program, they were able to take on 30% more activities than the group confined to traditional care (“Yoga for Health”).  The group that practiced yoga also experienced greater pain reduction (“Yoga for Health”).     

            Several trials have also found that yoga can lower blood pressure, cholesterol, resting heart rates, and help slow the progression of atherosclerosis, which are all risk factors for heart disease (“Yoga for Health”).  While almost any exercise is good for the heart, experts speculate yoga's meditative component may give it an extra boost by helping to stabilize the endothelium, the lining of the blood vessels that, when irritated, contributes to cardiovascular disease (“Yoga for Health”).  Since the lining is reactive to stress, and meditation can lower stress hormones, it is believed yoga causes a flow of events that reduces an individual’s risk of a heart attack or stroke (“Yoga for Health”).

            Another recent study suggests that regular yoga classes could help people with a common heart rhythm problem manage their symptoms while also improving their state of mind.  According to the American Heart Association, about 2.7 million people in the United States have atrial fibrillation (AF), in which the heart's upper chambers quiver chaotically instead of contracting normally (Pittman).  People with AF are often prescribed drugs such as beta blockers to help control their heart rate and rhythm (Pittman). However, researchers noted that the medicines do not alleviate symptoms for all patients, which is where additional treatment like yoga could come in (Pittman).  The new study included 49 people who have had AF for an average of five years (Pittman).  For three months, researchers led by Dr. Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy from the University of Kansas Medical Center in Kansas City tracked study volunteers' heart symptoms, blood pressure, and heart rate, as well as their anxiety, depression, and general quality of life (Pittman).  For the second phase of the study, the same participants went to group yoga classes at least twice a week for an additional three months, again reporting on their symptoms and quality of life (Pittman).  All of the patients were on stable medications throughout the study period (Pittman).  Nonetheless, the number of times they reported heart quivering, which was confirmed by a heart monitor, dropped from almost four times during the first three months to twice during the yoga intervention phase (Pittman).  Their average heart rate also fell from 67 beats per minute at the start of the study to between 61 and 62 beats per minute after yoga (Pittman).  Participants' anxiety scores declined from an average of 34, on a scale of 20 to 80, to 25 after three months of yoga (Pittman).  Depression and general mental health improved as well (Pittman).

            However, some people claim that they cannot do yoga because they are not flexible enough to do all of the positions correctly.  A popular misconception is that yoga focuses merely on increasing flexibility.  Yoga may bring to mind pretzel-like poses requiring considerable strength and balance, but in reality, beginner yoga classes provide simple, gentle movements that gradually build strength, balance, and flexibility (“Yoga for Arthritis”).  Most of the basic poses and positions are easy to do and do not require high amounts of flexibility to get results (“Yoga for Arthritis”).  The positions can also be modified to the individual.  It is suggested that people with high blood pressure, glaucoma, and women who are pregnant should modify or avoid some yoga poses (“Yoga for Health”).  In most cases yoga classes have helped most people improve their health (“Stress Management”). A number of studies have shown that yoga can help reduce stress and anxiety (“Stress Management”).  It can also enhance participants’ moods and overall sense of well-being. (“Stress Management”).  Practicing yoga can lead to improved balance, flexibility, range of motion, and strength, which means that an individual is less likely to injure themselves in other physical endeavors or in their daily activities (“Stress Management”). 

            Yoga not only helps us manage the stress we all feel as a result of our daily lives, but also various other health ailments as well.  Yoga helps control arthritis, high blood pressure, and back pain, among numerous other conditions that many Americans deal with on an everyday basis.  People should ultimately practice yoga because it reduces stress and tension and creates a sense of strength as well as serenity.  Yoga is a valuable exercise tool that helps alleviate the stress that we encounter in our hectic lifestyles as well as improve our physical and mental wellbeing.


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Works Cited

Pittman, Genevra. "Yoga may aid people with irregular heart rhythm." MedlinePlus. U.S. National Library of Medicine, 30 Jan 2013. Web. 9 Apr 2013.     <http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/news/fullstory_133581.html>.

Sifferlin, Alexandra. "Yoga and the Mind: Can Yoga Reduce Symptoms of Major Psychiatric      Disorders?." Time: Health and Family. 28 Jan 2013: n. page. Print.         <http://healthland.time.com/2013/01/28/yoga-and-the-mind-can-yoga-reduce-symptoms-          of-major-psychiatric-disorders/>.

"Stress Management." Mayo Clinic. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, 02    Aug 2011. Web. 9 Apr 2013. <http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/yoga/CM00004>.

"Stress Statistics." American Psychological Association. American Institute of Stress, 06 Apr        2012. Web. 20 Apr 2013. <http://www.statisticbrain.com/stress-statistics/>.

Tunney, John. "Why do Yoga?." The Yoga Site: The Online Yoga Resource Center. Yoga Site      Inc.. Web. 9 Apr 2013. <http://yogasite.com/why.htm>.

"Yoga for anxiety and depression." Harvard Health Publications. Harvard University, n.d. Web. 9 Apr 2013.             <http://www.health.harvard.edu/newsletters/Harvard_Mental_Health_Letter/2009/April/  Yoga-for-anxiety-and-depression>.

"Yoga for Arthritis." The Johns Hopkins Arthritis Center. N.p., 10 Oct 2012. Web. 9 Apr 2013.             <http://www.hopkinsarthritis.org/patient-corner/disease-management/yoga-for-arthritis/>.

"Yoga for Health." National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. U.S.     Department of Health and Human Services, 18 Sep 2012. Web. 9 Apr 2013.     <http://nccam.nih.gov/health/yoga/introduction.htm>.

Thursday, March 28, 2013

Should There be Stricter Gun Control Laws?


Liz Kelly

ENGL 102-057

Rogerian Argument Essay

16 March 2013

Should there be Stricter Gun Control Laws?

            The present gun control debate is a major topic at both a political and social level.  The resulting outcome of this current debate will affect almost everyone.  Gun owners and those who do not own guns across the nation all have passionate opinions as to the future of gun control in the United States.  Recently, there have been many rallies and marches from both sides of the debate, standing up for what they believe should be done or left alone.  Some call for stricter gun control laws while others declare that it is our right as citizens to bear arms and that this right is protected under the second amendment.  However, there must be stricter gun laws enacted in order to help ensure the safety of citizens of the United States.

            The current gun control laws must be revised in order to keep up with advances in firearms technology.  The right to bear arms as protected under the Second Amendment states, “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” ("Second Amendment-U.S. Constitution").  However, this amendment was written over 200 years ago and gun technology has changed drastically since the time this document was written.  There were no assault rifles present when the Second Amendment was ratified.  Allowing average citizens to stock up on their own arsenal is just asking for trouble.  There needs to be stricter regulations on the amount of ammunition and number of guns an individual may possess.  No one should be allowed to possess an unlimited amount of ammunition and weapons; it is too great of a risk factor.  Roughly 16,272 murders were committed in the United States during 2008.  Of these, about 10,886 or 67% were committed with firearms ("Gun Control"). 

            There also needs to be deeper background checks on individuals who wish to own a gun where not only the criminal record, but a full psychological or mental health examination is done as well.  Dispersing a weapon of any kind to an individual who has not been fully checked out is simply not good practice.  Based on survey data from the United States Department of Justice, roughly 5,340,000 violent crimes were committed in the United States during 2008 (“Gun Control”). These include simple/aggravated assaults, robberies, sexual assaults, rapes, and murders.  Of these, about 436,000 or 8% were committed by offenders visibly armed with a gun (“Gun Control”).  There should be stronger government regulations and local law enforcement regulations once the gun is in possession as well.  For example, there should be check-ups to make sure the gun is being stored securely in a safe and that the gun license has not expired.  Having a longer waiting period for purchasing a gun is also a good idea to discourage anyone from just buying a gun without a solid purpose.  To make the entire process of gun control more organized as well as easier there should be universal gun laws throughout the states.  If all of the states could get on the same page it would certainly increase efficiency of managing firearms. 

            Texas provides excellent an excellent example of how gun laws need to be improved.  For example, in Texas there is no waiting period for purchasing a firearm nor is there a state registration of firearms (“Texas Gun Laws”).  Since there is no state registration of firearms, there is no requirement to transfer the firearm in the name of the owner if they were to pass on the weapon to someone else.  With proper licensing (Concealed Handgun License) an individual may carry a pistol or revolver on them as long as it remains concealed (“Texas Gun Laws”).  Long guns (rifles / shotguns) do not have to be concealed, but must be carried in a manner not calculated to cause alarm, and these do not require a license (“Texas Gun Laws”).  However, what one individual may find alarming, another may not, which makes this law subjective.  With the passage of the Motorist Protection Act an individual may now readily carry handguns, loaded and within reach, as long as they conceal the firearm (“Texas Gun Laws”). Again, long guns do not have to be concealed and may be loaded and within reach (“Texas Gun Laws”).  Also in Texas, machine guns are legal (“Texas Gun Laws”).  Texas abides by Federal law which at this time has no restrictions on so-called "assault weapons" such as semi-auto AR15, FAL, G3 / HK91 rifles (“Texas Gun Laws”).  There is no limitation on magazines in the state of Texas either (“Texas Gun Laws”).    Massachusetts has stricter gun laws, however, there are still several areas where these laws can be improved.  An FID card permits the purchase, possession and carrying of non-large capacity rifles, shotguns and ammunition only (“MassWildlife”). The fee for an FID card is $100.00 for people over eighteen years old and only $25 for minors (“MassWildlife”). Applicants must be at least eighteen years old and may be as young as fifteen to seventeen years old with parental consent (“MassWildlife”). This ID card is valid for 6 years (“MassWildlife”).  First time FID applicants must have completed a MA Certified Firearms Safety Course or a Basic Hunter Education Course (“MassWildlife”).  However, to renew their license after six years an individual is not required to take the course again (“MassWildlife”).
 

Fig. 1. This image shows one of the many passionate protesters advocating for stricter gun laws (“Universal Hub”).

 
              People can benefit from moving toward a stricter gun control position to help prevent tragedies and create a safer environment for everyone.  In 2011 there were 12,664 murders in the US.   Of those, 8,583 were caused by firearms (Klein).  Of the 11 deadliest shootings in the US, six have happened from 2007 onward (Klein). On December 14th 2012, twenty kindergarten and first grade children as well as six adults were shot and killed at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut ("Sandy Hook Shooting”).  This was the second largest shooting in the history of the United States after Virginia Tech in 2007 (“Sandy Hook Shooting”).  Another recent mass shooting occurred on July 20th 2012 in Aurora, Colorado during a midnight premiere of the “Dark Knight Rises”.  Twelve people were killed and a total of 58 others were injured. Most of the victims were admitted with gunshot wounds, while some were being treated for injuries sustained during the ensuing chaos.  Eleven people were in critical condition ("Aurora, Colorado Theater Shooting Timeline"). Another tragedy occurred in Carson City, Nevada on September 7th 2011 (“Gun Violence”).  A man armed with an AK-46 assault rifle shot five uniformed National Guard members eating breakfast at an IHOP restaurant. Four people were killed and eight others were wounded in the attack.  In all of these cases the shooters had no limit as to the type of weapons they used, the amount of ammunition, or quantity of those weapons.  All of their actions prior to the shootings went unnoticed (“Gun Violence”). 

            On the other side of the debate, many argue that gun control laws should be left alone since it is our right to bear arms as citizens of the United States.  Countless numbers of gun owners use these weapons solely for recreational purposes such as hunting or at a shooting range, and they do so legally and safely.  Many citizens also own a gun for the sole means of protecting their home and family.  A 1993 nationwide survey of 4,977 households found that over the previous five years, at least 3.5 percent of households had members who had used a gun for self-protection or for the protection of property at home, work, or elsewhere (“Gun Control”). Applied to the United States population, this amounts to 1,029,615 such incidents per year. This figure excludes all military service, police work, or work as a security guard (“Gun Control”).

            Members in service require these weapons as part of their job and it is their responsibility to ensure that they are storing their weapon safely when not on duty.  Another argument opposing stricter gun laws is that these stricter regulations pose an inconvenience for law abiding citizens.  Why should they have to go through these deep background checks and wait an extensive period of time just to obtain a simple hand gun?  Another leading argument is that stricter gun control laws would in fact make it unsafe for law abiding citizens since they would be defenseless against convicts.  According to this line of thinking, even with stricter gun laws criminals will find a way to get guns anyway illegally.  Based on survey data from a 2000 study published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, United States civilians use guns to defend themselves and others from crime at least 989,883 times per year (“Gun Control”).  Many also argue why change the Second Amendment now, when it has worked for the last 200 years?

            Some possible compromises that would benefit both sides of the gun control debate involve not repealing the Second Amendment of the Constitution but revising it, as well as current gun laws, to fit the current circumstances and technology of today.  The right to bear arms should not be taken away from citizens, however, limitations do need to be put in order.  The Obama administration has already begun tackling this problem and there are several proposed Congressional actions that will help in the effort to make America safer.  Criminal background checks will be required for all gun sales, including those by private sellers that are currently exempt (Holyk). Another proposed action is reinstating and strengthening the ban on assault weapons that was in place from 1994 to 2004 (Holyk). Limiting ammunition magazines to 10 rounds and banning the possession of armor-piercing bullets by anyone other than members of the military and law enforcement are also on the table (Holyk). 

            This current control debate is fueled by passionate individuals on both sides of it who will undoubtedly be affected by the resulting outcomes.  As many demand stricter gun control laws, just as many call for the protection of their right to bear arms.  The second amendment does in fact protect our right as citizens of the United States to bear arms, however, current gun control regulations must be stricter in order to keep up with the current technology now readily available to citizens.  Such regulations will create a more organized society as well as help to prevent future tragedies in our country.          

             

           


 

Works Cited

"Aurora, Colorado Theater Shooting Timeline." World News. N.p., 26 Jul 2012. Web. 16 Mar        2013. <http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/world_news&id=8743134>.                 

"Gun Control." Just Facts. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 Mar 2013.      <http://www.justfacts.com/guncontrol.asp>.

"Gun Licensing Requirements." MassWildlife. N.p., 15 Jan 2013. Web. 26 Feb 2013.             <http://www.mass.gov/dfwele/dfw/education/hed/hed_gun_laws.htm>.

Holyk, Greg. "Majority Sees Obama’s Gun Control Plan Favorably." abc News. N.p., 24 Jan         2013. Web. 26 Feb 2013. <http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/01/majority- sees-obamas-gun-control-plan-favorably/>.

Klein, Ezra. "Twelve Facts about Guns and Mass Shootings in the United States." Washington     Post 14 Dec 2012, n. pag. Print.   
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2012/12/14/nine-facts-about-guns-and-mass-shootings-in-the-united-states/>.

“Man in Car Shot on Stoughton Street.” Universal Hub. N.p., 15 Feb 2013. Web. 21 Mar 2013.             <http://www.universalhub.com/crime/20130215-man-car-shot-stoughton-street.html>.

"Sandy Hook Shooting: What Happened?." CNN. N.p.. Web. 16 Mar 2013.             <http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2012/12/us/sandy-hook-timeline/index.html>.

"Second Amendment-U.S. Constitution." FindLaw. N.p., 28 Jun 2010. Web. 16 Mar 2013.             <http://constitution.findlaw.com/amendment2/amendment.html>.

"The Basics." Texas Gun Laws. N.p.. Web. 26 Feb 2013. <http://www.texasgunlaws.org/>.

"Tragedies." Coalition Against Gun Violence. Squonk Studios, 31 Oct. 2011. Web. 26 Feb.           2013.

Sunday, February 10, 2013

Renewable Energy Sources: Necessary for the Survival of the Planet


Liz Kelly

ENGL 102-057

Causal Argument Essay

24 January 2013

Renewable Energy Sources: Necessary for the Survival of the Planet

            The world is changing at a rapid rate.  Now more than ever, humans are dependent on the earth’s natural resources, particularly fossil fuels.  In fact, 82 percent of the energy used in this country emanates from fossil fuels (“Institute for Energy Research”).  Oil, coal, and natural gas heat our homes, power our cars, generate electricity, and essentially run America's industries.  However, at the rate we as a human race are consuming these resources, how much longer will it be before we have drained the earth dry of these natural resources?  Already, there are fewer and fewer oil reserves.  Not to mention the terrible consequences using and burning these fossil fuels are having on the environment, particularly global warming, bizarre weather patterns, and the horrible effects that take place in the event of an oil spill.  In order to ensure the survival of the planet and in turn the human race it is necessary to switch to forms of renewable energy sources such as wind, solar, and geothermal; switching to these sources will have the nation no longer dependent on foreign oil, significantly reduce global warming, and allow us to live independently as well as in harmony with our environment indefinitely.

            Our dependency on foreign oil threatens our national security as well as our nation’s economy.  Of the imported petroleum Americans consume, 68 percent is supplied by countries that are on the edge of instability.  Oil dependence provides leverage and money to potential adversaries, and risks ensnaring the U.S. state in endless conflicts abroad to secure access to oil (“American Security Project”).  U.S. defense spending is the highest in the world. Much of this expenditure is spent securing sea-lanes for oil ships.  Other developing countries that depend on oil and gas for growth may seek to challenge the United States’ naval dominance.  For example, as China seeks natural resources to foster growth, it could come into military conflict with the United States if shipping lanes become areas of contention.  More importantly, however, the world’s dependence on oil empowers foreign leaders. The transnational sale of oil enriches a select few within the exporting country (Fay).        

            As for economically, Americans send over $1 billion abroad every day to pay for oil.  The outcome is lost jobs and growing dollars in the hands of foreigners who we increasingly depend on to finance our deficits.  The U.S. borrows money from the Chinese to buy oil from the Saudis, causing greater national debt and dependence on the goodwill of others to allow its economy to function (“American Security Project”).  Renewable energy sources will enable us to be self-sufficient and not be reliant upon other countries for a limited resource.

            Another issue that may soon be solved by switching to renewable forms of energy is global warming.  By the end of the century, if recent trends carry on, the global temperature could rise so high that the climate and weather patterns that have given rise to human civilization would be drastically altered.  However, this is not simply a natural process that has happened on its own. We are driving climate change by burning fossil fuels such as coal and oil (“Greenpeace USA”).  Wind, water, and solar energy would reduce world power demand by 30 percent, thereby avoiding 13,000 coal power plants (Bergeron).  In fact, coal-fired power plants are the single largest U.S. source of global warming pollution (“Greenpeace USA”).  Greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide and other pollutants, primarily produced by the burning of fossil fuels collect in the atmosphere, trap heat from the sun, and cause the planet to warm. Global warming has adverse effects on weather patterns, (as seen with the recent devastating effects of Hurricane Sandy), human health, wildlife, sea levels and the glaciers (Abbott).  With current technology, renewable energy sources such as wind, solar, and geothermal can provide 96 percent of our electricity and 98 percent of our entire heating demand which would account for almost all of our primary energy demand (“Greenpeace USA”).  More than half of U.S. states have adopted a renewable electricity standard which is a policy that requires electricity suppliers to progressively increase their use of renewable energy such as wind, solar, geothermal, and bioenergy. These states are demonstrating that renewable standards are an affordable solution to reduce carbon dioxide and other unhealthy air emissions, while relieving the harmful impact that fossil fuel extraction, transport, and use have on land and water resources (“Clean Energy”). Investing in renewable energy could jumpstart our waning economy, creating millions of jobs that cannot be shipped overseas. It could put the U.S. back at the forefront of the 21st century economy, ahead of China, which in 2009 became the largest global investor in renewable forms of energy.  Then, with significantly decreasing global warming comes the protection of countless wildlife species particularly in the northern regions.  Oil spills contribute to global warming as well as can damage the ecosystem beyond repair, as seen with the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010.  Switching to renewable energy will significantly decrease global warming as well as save countless ecosystems from potential environmentally hazardous oil spills.

            With these alternative energy sources comes the reassuring reality that they are in fact renewable.  Renewable energy is energy derived from natural resources that replenish themselves over a period of time without diminishing the Earth's resources. These resources also have the added benefit of being plentiful, available in some capacity virtually everywhere, and they cause little, if any, environmental harm.  For example, these include energy from the sun, wind, and thermal energy stored in the Earth's crust.  In contrast, fossil fuels such as oil, coal, and natural gas are not renewable, since their quantity is limited.  Once we have extracted them from the earth, they will cease to be available for use as an economically-viable energy source. Although they are produced through natural processes, these processes are too slow to replenish these fuels as speedily as humans use them. Therefore, these sources will run out sooner or later (“Green-e”).  Renewable energy sources are the key to securing our planet’s future. 

            The strongest opposing arguments against switching to renewable energy sources are that it is costly to do so and therefore we should be tapping into our domestic oil supply first before we fully invest in renewable energy.  The preproduction expenses to construct a renewable energy plan are tremendously high, much more so than the conventional power resources we have grown familiar to.  The time it will take to recover these preliminary costs is around ten to fifteen years. This is a good deal of money for private capital investors to support while they wait for a return on their money (“Renewable Power News”).

            However, switching will ultimately save money in the long run since we will not be paying extremely high amounts for what oil is left in an eventually depleting market.  Also, $56 billion worth of grants and tax incentives is already available to the renewable energy and efficiency industries, in the U.S. alone (Hodge).  Although high, the initial cost is worth the outcome.  Once this initial investment has been made, materials are generally free. As a result, the only costs associated with renewable energy production are maintenance, labor, and regulatory fees (Climatepedia).  Furthermore, tapping into our own domestic supply of oil will only sustain us temporarily, as it is not a long term solution.  Also, these oil reserves would include national wildlife reserves that are currently legally protected.  Imagine the devastation if an oil spill were to occur on the ANWR, the effects would be catastrophic.

Fig. 1. This image illustrates the striking effect switching to renewable energy sources will have on the environment (Google image).

            The world is not the same as it was 500 years ago, and in more ways than one.  The changes are not all positive and as a result of human activity on this planet, earth is heading down a dangerous path.  Renewable energy sources, however, provide a reasonable, doable way out of our dilemma. Barack Obama discussed the importance of change to renewable forms of energy as a nation in his Address to a Joint Session of Congress in 2009.  In this speech, Obama stated, “To truly transform our economy, protect our security, and save our planet from the ravages of climate change, we need to ultimately make clean, renewable energy the profitable kind of energy.”  These resources allow us the ability to be independent of other countries’ oil supplies, reduce global warming, and to stop aggressively taking from our planet what cannot so easily be replenished. 

 


 

Works Cited

Abbott, Billie. "Green Living: Ideas to Help Reduce Global Warming." National Geographic. National Geographic Society, n.d. Web. 3 Feb 2013.   <http://greenliving.nationalgeographic.com/actions-people-can-stop-global-warming-2441.html>.

"Arguments for and Against Renewable Energy." Renewable Power News: News about Solar,
            Wind, and alternative green power technologies. Renewable Power News, 17 Dec 2009.      Web. 3 Feb 2013. <http://www.renewablepowernews.com/archives/704>.

Bergeron, Louis. "Shifting to 100% Renewable Energy Would Save Money." Renewable
             Energy World. Renewable Energy World.com, 21 Oct 2009. Web. 3 Feb 2013.           <http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2009/10/shifting-the-world-to-100-            renewable-energy-by-2030-may-reduce-world-power-demand-by-30>.

Fay, William. "US Too Dependent on Foreign Oil." Daily Trojan. N.p., 27 Apr 2011. Web. 3 Feb 2013. <http://dailytrojan.com/2011/04/27/us-too-dependent-on-foreign-oil/>.

"Fossil Fuels." Institute for Energy Research. N.p.. Web. 5 Feb 2013. <http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/energy-overview/fossil-fuels/>.

Hodge, Nick. "These Numbers Don't Lie: Live from the Renewable Energy Finance Forum Wall Street." Energy and Capital. Angel Publishing LLC, 24 Jun 2009. Web. 10 Feb 2013. <http://www.energyandcapital.com/articles/renewable-energy-statistics/900>.

Obama, Barack. Address to Joint Session of Congress. House Chamber of the U.S. Capitol, Washington, D.C.. 24 Feb 2009. Address.

Renewable Energy. 2006. SBC: TechnologiesWeb. 5 Feb 2013. <http://www.sbc-technologies.com/sbc-technologies-renewableEnergy.php>.

 "Renewable Energy: Knowledge." Climatepedia. N.p.. Web. 10 Feb 2013. <http://www.climatepedia.org/Renewable-Energy>.

"Renewable Energy Standards-Mitigating Global Warming." Clean Energy. Union of Concerned Scientists, 12 Feb 2009. Web. 3 Feb 2013. <http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_energy/smart-energy-solutions/increase-renewables/renewable-energy.html>.

"Stop Global Warming." Greenpeace USA. N.p.. Web. 3 Feb 2013. <http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/en/campaigns/global-warming-and-energy/>.

"U.S. Oil Dependence Threatens Security, Economy,Environment: New Joint Report Shows the      Problems with and Solutions to U.S. Oil Addiction." American Security Project. N.p., 27 May 2010. Web. 3 Feb 2013. <http://americansecurityproject.org/press-releases/2010/u-s-oil-dependence-threatens-security-economy-environment-new-joint-report-shows-the problems-with-and-solutions-to-u-s-oil-addiction/>.
"Why Renewable Energy?." Green-e. N.p.. Web. 3 Feb 2013.                 <http://www.greene.org/learn_re_why.shtml>.

Friday, February 8, 2013

Homework 2/8/13


Homework 2/8/13

Exercise 12.1à”The Wife-Beater”

1.)    Thesis- Everyone wears the stylish tank-style underwear shirt, however, it is their name that is the issue as they are known as “wife-beaters”

2.)    3 problems associated with defining the term wife-beater

-          Odd name for an undershirt

-          Ugly stereotypes behind the name are both obvious and toxic

-          It appears to be cool to say the name without fear of (or without caring about) hurting anyone

3.)    She includes dictionary definitions of wife-beater to show that the name is fueled by stereotype is now an academically established fact.  Her definition is different than these dictionary definitions because she sees the tank style shirts as a piece of clothing that can make both men and women look sexier and as such should have a name connotation of flattery not violence

4.)    She introduces a possible objection to her argument when she says wearers under 25 do not seem disturbed by the name and ignore the overtones of the term wife-beater. She refutes this, however, by providing the statistics that more than 4 million women are victims of severe assaults by boyfriends and husbands each year and that the average age of a batterer is 31.  This, especially the last statistic argues that the name should be changed and that the connotation behind it is not so easy to ignore.

5.)    I think this image would strengthen her argument. She states that “manly” should not equal “violence” which is what many women associate with the shirt.  I think by showing a strong man wearing the shirt can either imply one of two things depending on how the shirt is defined. If defined as a wife-beater it is easy to see this man as potentially being abusive especially because he looks tough and isn’t smiling, which is the exact negative connotation Smith is talking about. However, if the name was different or if it was simply called a tank top, then the man just looks strong and manly with no negative connotation to it.   

Homework 2/5/13


Homework 2/5/13

“Identifying the Elements of Argument”

1.)    Marvel Comics were good for him as a kid because they were juvenile and violent; freed him in a way

2.)        bond with other kids, made new friends

-          self-confidenceàhad a “fantasy self” who was unafraid of his desires and the world’s disapproval; eventually led him to become a writerà “arrogant, self-exposing, self-assertive, superheroic decision to become a writer”

-          allows people to pull themselves out of emotional traps by immersing themselves in violent storiesàmakes them braver in scary situations, a way to conquer fear that we all encounter in our lives

-          according to psychologist Melanie Moore, “Children need violent entertainment inn order to explore the inescapable feelings that they’ve been taught to deny, and to reintegrate those feelings into a more whole, more complex, more resilient selfhood”

3.)    -    pop psychologists insisting that violent stories are harmful to kidsà “Fear, greed, power-hunger, rage: these are aspect of ourselves that we try not to experience in our lives but often want, even need, to experience vicariously through stories of others”

-          Found that every aspect even the trashiest pop-culture story can have its own developmental functionàpretending to have superhuman powers helps children conquer the feelings of powerlessness that inevitably come with being so young and small

4.)    When parents try to protect their children from their own feelings and fantasies, they don’t shelter them against violence but against strength and selfhood

 

Exercise 2.3àHighlighting

Important points:

-          Makes kids feel powerful and strong

-          Gives kids the courage to conquer their fears and to not fear being afraid but to face fear head on

-          Superhero stories help kids negotiate the conflicts between the inner self and the public self as they work through the early stages of socialization

-          Allows them to utilize rage, which is a natural emotion constructively, rather than suppress it and make it worse

 

Exercise 2.4àAnnotating

-          I agree that comic books, particularly superhero ones, can help kids with their self-confidence and feel powerful

-          However, while a certain degree of violence can be beneficial in child development, a lot can be detrimental which the author does not mention; too much violence can lead to kids becoming desensitized to it and thinking it is okay to punch someone when they have a disagreement for example, especially if the kids do not have someone to explain that the comic strips they are reading are in fact just thatàjust for fun; they can look up to the characters and let them make them feel stronger but in the real world they cannot go around beating people up; it’s good for them to pretend to be a superhero and channel rage that way but parents must still stress violence is not the answer

-          I also disagree on the amount of violence he ultimately says is okay, especially when dealing with blood; comics shouldn’t be glorifying bloody altercations, that is just asking for troubleàfor example the video game black ops is violent media that kids should not be exposed to due to its extreme violence and gruesome images

 

Exercise 2.8àWriting a Critical Response

            According to Gerard Jones, violent media can actually have positive effects on young people because it enables kids to feel powerful and gives them the courage to conquer their fears.  Jones also believes that violent media are a positive influence on children because they help kids negotiate the conflicts between the inner self and the public self as they work through the early stages of socialization.  Jones makes some good points.  For example, he says he has found that every aspect of even the trashiest pop-culture story can have its own developmental function: pretending to have superhuman powers helps children conquer the feelings of powerlessness that inevitably come with being so young and small.  However, he is not going to argue that violent entertainment is harmless.  All in all, trying to protect children from their own feelings and fantasies does not shelter them against violence, but against power and selfhood.